Transaction Search Form: please type in any of the fields below.
Date: April 30, 2024 Tue
Time: 1:24 am
Time: 1:24 am
Results for netherlands
3 results foundAuthor: Kleinepier, Tom Title: The Temporal Dynamics of Neighborhood Disadvantage in Childhood and Subsequent Problem Behavior in Adolescence Summary: Abstract Research on neighborhood effects has increasingly focused on how long children have lived in a deprived neighborhood during childhood (duration), but has typically ignored when in childhood the exposure occurred (timing) and whether neighborhood circumstances were improving or deteriorating (sequencing). In this article, the authors applied sequence analysis to simultaneously capture children's duration, timing, and sequencing of exposure to neighborhood (dis)advantage in childhood. Logistic regression analysis was subsequently used to test how different patterns of exposure are related to teenage parenthood, school dropout, and delinquent behavior. Using register data from the Netherlands, an entire cohort was followed from birth in 1995 up until age 19 in 2014 (N = 168,645, 48.8 percent females, 83.2 percent native Dutch). Compared to children who had lived in a deprived neighborhood throughout childhood, children who were exposed to neighborhood deprivation only during adolescence were found to be equally likely to become a teenage parent and were even more likely to drop out of school. Unexpectedly, children who had lived in an affluent neighborhood throughout childhood were most likely to engage in delinquent behavior. Possible explanations and implications are discussed. Details: Bonn, Germany: Institute for Labor Economics, 2018. 30p. Source: Internet Resource: Accessed January 10, 2019 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29961241 Year: 2018 Country: Netherlands URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061086/ Shelf Number: 154126 Keywords: Adolescence Childhood Neighborhood effectsNetherlands Problem Behavior School DropoutSequence Analysis Temporal Dynamics |
Author: Apperloo, Esther Title: Onveiligheid Stoppen, Bij Het Shoppen...: Onderzoek naar de Invloed van Toezicht in Winkelgebieden op de Veiligheidsbeleving van Mensen (Stop Insecurity, When Shopping ...: Investigation of the Influence of Supervision in Shopping Areas on the Safety Expe Summary: Background information Dutch municipalities have introduced camera surveillance in public spaces with different objectives, namely prevention of crime and nuisance, the timely identification of threatening security problems and the collection of offender information that can improve the investigation (Homburg et al., 2012). The most important goals are maintaining and supervising public order and increasing the safety of citizens (Schreijenberg, Koffijberg & Dekkers, 2009). The introduction of CCTV is mainly justified by two assumed effects, namely the increase of objective safety through situational prevention and the enhancement of subjective safety (Geelhoed, 2005). There is a question of increasing objective safety when crime actually falls. Increased subjective safety occurs when people feel safer because of the presence of the cameras, regardless of whether it has become safer in the objective sense (Van Eijk et al., 2006). Details: Enschede, Netherlands: Universiteit Twente, 2015. 73p. Source: Internet Resource (in Dutch): Accessed January 12, 2019 at: https://anzdoc.com/onderzoeks-en-adviesgroep-politie.html Year: 2015 Country: Netherlands URL: https://anzdoc.com/onderzoeks-en-adviesgroep-politie.html Shelf Number: 154085 Keywords: Camera SurveillanceCCTVCrime PreventionNetherlandsPublic Order MaintenancePublic SafetySituational Crime Prevention |
Author: Flight, Sander Title: Evaluatie Cameratoezicht Amsterdam: Effectmeting August Allebeplein, Belgieplein en Kraaiennest (Camera Surveillance Evaluation in Amsterdam: Measurement Effect August Allebeplein, Belgieplein and Kraaiennest) Summary: In the municipality of Amsterdam, there has been one in three places in recent years experiment with camera surveillance in public space. The city council has decided to first carry out a thorough evaluation, before taking a final position on an extension of camera surveillance in the city. The effects of camera surveillance must demonstrably positive and camera surveillance must not lead to displacement of nuisance and crime. In this report, the results of the baseline measurement of mid - 2001 and the measurement of effect from mid-2002. In addition to an impact evaluation focused on the development of the objective and the subjective crime, a process evaluation has also been carried out. Together these two offer parts the information that is needed for the future municipal policy on camera surveillance. The experiment with camera surveillance in the city center is due to postponement excluded from this evaluation. At the time of writing is the planning such that camera surveillance will be operational after the summer holidays. This project will of course also be evaluated - the preparations for the baseline measurements have already been taken. Details: Amsterdam, Netherlands: DSP groep, 2003. 69p. Source: Internet Resource (in Dutch): Accessed January 14, 2019 at: https://publicaties.dsp-groep.nl/getFile.cfm?file=03_23_Evaluatie%20cameratoezicht%20Amsterdam%20Effectmeting%20August%20Allebeplein%20Belgieplein%20en%20Kraaiennest_23-2003.pdf&dir=rapport Year: 2003 Country: Netherlands URL: https://publicaties.dsp-groep.nl/getFile.cfm?file=03_23_Evaluatie%20cameratoezicht%20Amsterdam%20Effectmeting%20August%20Allebeplein%20Belgieplein%20en%20Kraaiennest_23-2003.pdf&dir=rapport Shelf Number: 154045 Keywords: Camera Surveillance Impact Evaluation Netherlands |